FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Colombia
Colombia: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Colombia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Colombia is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 3.6% on the previous year and up 50.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Colombia peaked at 0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2013.
That places Colombia 123rd out of 205 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Colombia, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 1963 | 0.001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.9% |
| 1964 | 0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.4% |
| 1967 | 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 1968 | 0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 1969 | 0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 1970 | 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 1971 | 0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0006 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 1973 | 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP | -15.7% |
| 1974 | 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.4% |
| 1975 | 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1976 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 1977 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -21.0% |
| 1978 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 1979 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.5% |
| 1980 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.9% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.9% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 1985 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | +10.0% |
| 1986 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | +0.2% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.3% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.0% |
| 1991 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 1995 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.2% |
| 1996 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1997 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 1998 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +11.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +13.9% |
| 2000 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.1% |
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -9.4% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.8% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -20.1% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -21.6% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.1% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.9% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +1.1% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -18.9% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.0% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +33.8% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.9% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.8% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +7.0% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +7.4% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +21.8% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.5% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -3.6% |
Colombia compared with similar countries
- Colombia's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 52% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Colombia's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 1.0× the median. (38 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0008 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Colombia
More reference data data for Colombia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4113 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 19.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.81 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 2.67 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 61.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 94.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.24 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Colombia?
- Fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Colombia was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp recorded in Colombia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp recorded in Colombia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2013.
- How does Colombia rank for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp?
- Colombia ranks 123rd out of 205 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Colombia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 50.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Colombia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
FAO projections of arable land ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- FAO projections of arable land Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.