FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Botswana
Botswana: FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Botswana, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Botswana is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 4.7% on the previous year and down 31.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Botswana peaked at 0.0122 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961 and was at its lowest, 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
Botswana ranks 124th of 205 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP in Botswana, year by year
| Year | hectares per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0122 hectares per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1962 | 0.0112 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 1963 | 0.0105 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0096 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1965 | 0.0088 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 1966 | 0.0078 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0068 hectares per US$ of GDP | -12.2% |
| 1968 | 0.0061 hectares per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0052 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 1970 | 0.0042 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.6% |
| 1971 | 0.0031 hectares per US$ of GDP | -24.5% |
| 1972 | 0.0024 hectares per US$ of GDP | -22.3% |
| 1973 | 0.0016 hectares per US$ of GDP | -32.6% |
| 1974 | 0.0013 hectares per US$ of GDP | -20.2% |
| 1975 | 0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.8% |
| 1976 | 0.0011 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 1977 | 0.0009 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0007 hectares per US$ of GDP | -23.5% |
| 1979 | 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP | -27.6% |
| 1980 | 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP | -22.7% |
| 1981 | 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP | -1.2% |
| 1982 | 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP | +6.3% |
| 1983 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.4% |
| 1984 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 1985 | 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP | +11.9% |
| 1986 | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.9% |
| 1987 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -28.8% |
| 1988 | 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP | -25.7% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -13.2% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -17.5% |
| 1991 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -31.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -20.7% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +39.4% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +10.2% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -21.3% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.4% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | -16.0% |
| 1998 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -19.6% |
| 1999 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | +38.0% |
| 2001 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -39.6% |
| 2002 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +23.5% |
| 2003 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -42.3% |
| 2004 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -2.9% |
| 2005 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.5% |
| 2006 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2007 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -14.9% |
| 2008 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +50.4% |
| 2009 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +20.0% |
| 2010 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -34.3% |
| 2011 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.5% |
| 2012 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2013 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 2014 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +32.2% |
| 2015 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -26.0% |
| 2016 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -10.3% |
| 2017 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -6.3% |
| 2018 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -5.4% |
| 2019 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +2.0% |
| 2020 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +11.8% |
| 2021 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -20.2% |
| 2022 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | -7.7% |
| 2023 | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | +4.7% |
Botswana compared with similar countries
- Botswana's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 hectares per US$ of GDP, 51% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Botswana's 0 hectares per US$ of GDP is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.0002 hectares per US$ of GDP, 8% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0087 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0052 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0122 hectares per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0017 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0005 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0042 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0003 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 0 hectares per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
More reference data data for Botswana
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0472 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0078 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.97 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.25 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0424 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Botswana?
- Fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp in Botswana was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0122 hectares per US$ of GDP in 1961.
- What is the lowest fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 hectares per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Botswana rank for fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp?
- Botswana ranks 124th out of 205 countries with data for 2023.
- Is fao projections of arable land, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 31.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of FAO projections of arable land, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
FAO projections of arable land ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- FAO projections of arable land Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
FAO projections of arable land divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.