Engaged Society Score in Lithuania
Lithuania: Engaged Society Score was 1.79 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
1.79
Change on year
up 18.7%
World rank
39th
of 176 countries
All-time high
2.25
in 1990
All-time low
-2.32
in 1826
Years of data
231
1795–2025
Engaged Society Score in Lithuania, 1795–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for engaged society score in Lithuania is 1.79, measured in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 18.7% on the previous year and up 14.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, engaged society score in Lithuania peaked at 2.25 in 1990 and was at its lowest, -2.32, in 1826.
Lithuania ranks 39th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Engaged Society Score in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1795 | -1.81 | — |
| 1796 | -2.31 | +27.7% |
| 1797 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -2.31 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.83 | -20.6% |
| 1803 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.83 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -2.32 | +26.4% |
| 1827 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -2.32 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -1.44 | -37.7% |
| 1856 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1866 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1867 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1868 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1869 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1870 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1871 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1872 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1873 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1874 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1876 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1877 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1878 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1880 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1881 | -1.44 | -0.0% |
| 1882 | -1.54 | +6.6% |
| 1883 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -1.54 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -1.06 | -30.9% |
| 1906 | -0.678 | -36.2% |
| 1907 | -0.824 | +21.5% |
| 1908 | -0.9 | +9.2% |
| 1909 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1914 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1916 | -0.9 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | 0.682 | -175.8% |
| 1918 | -0.338 | -149.6% |
| 1919 | -0.338 | -0.0% |
| 1920 | -0.338 | -0.0% |
| 1921 | -0.338 | -0.0% |
| 1922 | -0.338 | -0.0% |
| 1923 | -0.338 | -0.0% |
| 1924 | -0.338 | -0.0% |
| 1925 | -0.338 | -0.0% |
| 1926 | -0.338 | -0.0% |
| 1927 | -1.19 | +251.2% |
| 1928 | -1.23 | +3.2% |
| 1929 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1930 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1931 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1932 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1934 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1935 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1936 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1937 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1938 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1939 | -1.23 | -0.0% |
| 1940 | -2.24 | +83.2% |
| 1941 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1949 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1951 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.24 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -1.86 | -17.2% |
| 1954 | -0.2 | -89.2% |
| 1955 | -0.2 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -0.082 | -59.0% |
| 1957 | 0.064 | -178.0% |
| 1958 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1959 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1960 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1961 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1963 | 0.064 | +0.0% |
| 1964 | 0.035 | -45.3% |
| 1965 | -0.283 | -908.6% |
| 1966 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -0.283 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -0.433 | +53.0% |
| 1969 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1970 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1972 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1984 | -0.433 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -0.209 | -51.7% |
| 1986 | 0.797 | -481.3% |
| 1987 | 0.929 | +16.6% |
| 1988 | 1.02 | +9.7% |
| 1989 | 1.22 | +19.3% |
| 1990 | 2.25 | +85.1% |
| 1991 | 1.95 | -13.3% |
| 1992 | 1.95 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.54 | -21.0% |
| 1994 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.54 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.61 | +4.5% |
| 2008 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.61 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.57 | -2.7% |
| 2014 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.57 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.973 | -37.9% |
| 2017 | 1.52 | +56.3% |
| 2018 | 1.2 | -21.4% |
| 2019 | 1.51 | +26.4% |
| 2020 | 1.51 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1.51 | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 1.51 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.51 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.51 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 1.79 | +18.7% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 1.79 is above the median for high income countries, which is 1.67, 1.1× the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 1.79 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.54, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | -2.21 | -2.31 | -1.81 | 5 |
| 1800s | -1.93 | -2.31 | -1.83 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.83 | -1.83 | -1.83 | 10 |
| 1820s | -2.03 | -2.32 | -1.83 | 10 |
| 1830s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1840s | -2.32 | -2.32 | -2.32 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.88 | -2.32 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1860s | -1.44 | -1.44 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1870s | -1.44 | -1.44 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.52 | -1.54 | -1.44 | 10 |
| 1890s | -1.54 | -1.54 | -1.54 | 10 |
| 1900s | -1.21 | -1.54 | -0.678 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.6294 | -0.9 | 0.682 | 10 |
| 1920s | -0.6003 | -1.23 | -0.338 | 10 |
| 1930s | -1.23 | -1.23 | -1.23 | 10 |
| 1940s | -2.24 | -2.24 | -2.24 | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.8881 | -2.24 | 0.064 | 10 |
| 1960s | -0.1424 | -0.433 | 0.064 | 10 |
| 1970s | -0.433 | -0.433 | -0.433 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.1587 | -0.433 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.69 | 1.54 | 2.25 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.56 | 1.54 | 1.61 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.47 | 0.973 | 1.61 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.56 | 1.51 | 1.79 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More reference data data for Lithuania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2893 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1106 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9699 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6729 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5859 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6578 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is engaged society score in Lithuania?
- Engaged society score in Lithuania was 1.79 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest engaged society score recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 2.25 in 1990.
- What is the lowest engaged society score recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.32 in 1826.
- How does Lithuania rank for engaged society score?
- Lithuania ranks 39th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is engaged society score rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Engaged Society Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 231 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which ordinary people independently discuss important policy changes among themselves, in the media, in associations or neighborhoods, or in the streets.