Fiji vs Lithuania: Engaged Society Score
Fiji
1.73
in 2025
Lithuania
1.79
in 2025
Fiji rank
41st
Lithuania rank
39th
Engaged Society Score over time
- Fiji
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1.79 against 1.73 in Fiji, a difference of 0.06.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 41st and Lithuania ranks 39th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 9 and Lithuania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | -0.514 | -1.21 | 0.6914 | Fiji |
| 1910s | -0.514 | -0.6294 | 0.1154 | Fiji |
| 1920s | -0.514 | -0.6003 | 0.0863 | Fiji |
| 1930s | -0.514 | -1.23 | 0.711 | Fiji |
| 1940s | -0.514 | -2.24 | 1.73 | Fiji |
| 1950s | -0.0758 | -0.8881 | 0.8123 | Fiji |
| 1960s | 0.112 | -0.1424 | 0.2544 | Fiji |
| 1970s | 0.996 | -0.433 | 1.43 | Fiji |
| 1980s | 0.3843 | 0.1587 | 0.2256 | Fiji |
| 1990s | 0.4039 | 1.69 | 1.29 | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.2999 | 1.56 | 1.26 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0.5938 | 1.47 | 0.8793 | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 1.51 | 1.56 | 0.0472 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher engaged society score, Fiji or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 1.79 against 1.73 in Fiji as of 2025.
- What is the difference in engaged society score between Fiji and Lithuania?
- 0.06, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Lithuania?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Fiji and Lithuania rank globally for engaged society score?
- Fiji ranks 41st and Lithuania ranks 39th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Engaged Society Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which ordinary people independently discuss important policy changes among themselves, in the media, in associations or neighborhoods, or in the streets.