Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 76.23 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
76.23
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
33rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
76.23
in 2003
All-time low
76.23
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Zimbabwe, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 76.22004: 76.22005: 76.22006: 76.22007: 76.22008: 76.22009: 76.22010: 76.22011: 76.22012: 76.22013: 76.22014: 76.22015: 76.22016: 76.22017: 76.22018: 76.22019: 76.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Zimbabwe is 76.23, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Zimbabwe peaked at 76.23 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 76.23, in 2003.

That places Zimbabwe 33rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Zimbabwe, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Zimbabwe, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 76.23
2004 76.23 +0.0%
2005 76.23 +0.0%
2006 76.23 +0.0%
2007 76.23 +0.0%
2008 76.23 +0.0%
2009 76.23 +0.0%
2010 76.23 +0.0%
2011 76.23 +0.0%
2012 76.23 +0.0%
2013 76.23 +0.0%
2014 76.23 +0.0%
2015 76.23 +0.0%
2016 76.23 +0.0%
2017 76.23 +0.0%
2018 76.23 +0.0%
2019 76.23 +0.0%

Zimbabwe compared with similar countries

  • Zimbabwe's 76.23 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 1.2× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Zimbabwe's 76.23 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 61.89, 1.2× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 76.23 76.23 76.23 7
2010s 76.23 76.23 76.23 10

Countries ranked near Zimbabwe

  1. 31 Australia 76.89 compare
  2. 32 Indonesia 76.79 compare
  3. 33 Kyrgyzstan 76.23 compare
  4. 35 Iceland 75.66 compare
  5. 36 Thailand 75.41 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Zimbabwe

All data for Zimbabwe →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Zimbabwe?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Zimbabwe was 76.23 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Zimbabwe?
The highest recorded value was 76.23 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Zimbabwe?
The lowest recorded value was 76.23 in 2003.
How does Zimbabwe rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Zimbabwe ranks 33rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Zimbabwe. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/zimbabwe/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Zimbabwe</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.