Australia vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Australia
76.89
in 2019
Zimbabwe
76.23
in 2019
Australia rank
29th
Zimbabwe rank
31st
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Australia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Australia currently reports 76.89 against 76.23 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.66.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 188 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.46 | 76.23 | 1.23 | Australia |
| 2010s | 77.06 | 76.23 | 0.8278 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Australia or Zimbabwe?
- Australia, at 76.89 against 76.23 in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.66, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Australia ranks 29th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.