Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Tanzania

Tanzania: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 67.62 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
67.62
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
75th
of 191 countries
All-time high
67.62
in 2003
All-time low
67.62
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Tanzania, 2003–2019

02040602003201120192003: 67.62004: 67.62005: 67.62006: 67.62007: 67.62008: 67.62009: 67.62010: 67.62011: 67.62012: 67.62013: 67.62014: 67.62015: 67.62016: 67.62017: 67.62018: 67.62019: 67.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Tanzania is 67.62, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Tanzania peaked at 67.62 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 67.62, in 2003.

That places Tanzania 75th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Tanzania, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Tanzania, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 67.62 —
2004 67.62 +0.0%
2005 67.62 +0.0%
2006 67.62 +0.0%
2007 67.62 +0.0%
2008 67.62 +0.0%
2009 67.62 +0.0%
2010 67.62 +0.0%
2011 67.62 +0.0%
2012 67.62 +0.0%
2013 67.62 +0.0%
2014 67.62 +0.0%
2015 67.62 +0.0%
2016 67.62 +0.0%
2017 67.62 +0.0%
2018 67.62 +0.0%
2019 67.62 +0.0%

Tanzania compared with similar countries

  • Tanzania's 67.62 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Tanzania's 67.62 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 61.89, 1.1× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 67.62 67.62 67.62 7
2010s 67.62 67.62 67.62 10

Countries ranked near Tanzania

  1. 73 Romania 67.87 compare
  2. 74 Netherlands 67.7 compare
  3. 75 Sierra Leone 67.62 compare
  4. 77 Chile 67.3 compare
  5. 78 Iraq 67.21 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Tanzania

All data for Tanzania →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Tanzania?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Tanzania was 67.62 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Tanzania?
The highest recorded value was 67.62 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Tanzania?
The lowest recorded value was 67.62 in 2003.
How does Tanzania rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
Tanzania ranks 75th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Tanzania?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Tanzania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Tanzania. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/tanzania/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Tanzania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.