Chile vs Tanzania: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Chile
67.3
in 2019
Tanzania
67.62
in 2019
Chile rank
77th
Tanzania rank
75th
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Chile
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 67.62 against 67.3 in Chile, a difference of 0.32.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 77th and Tanzania ranks 75th of 191 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.13 | 67.62 | 0.4918 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 67.15 | 67.62 | 0.4754 | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Chile or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 67.62 against 67.3 in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Chile and Tanzania?
- 0.32, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Tanzania rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Chile ranks 77th and Tanzania ranks 75th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.