Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Papua New Guinea
Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 61.39 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Papua New Guinea, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Papua New Guinea stood at 61.39. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Papua New Guinea peaked at 61.39 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 61.39, in 2003.
Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in Papua New Guinea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 61.39 | — |
| 2004 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 61.39 | +0.0% |
Papua New Guinea compared with similar countries
- Papua New Guinea's 61.39 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 61.39, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Papua New Guinea's 61.39 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 73.57, 83% of the median. (28 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.39 | 61.39 | 61.39 | 7 |
| 2010s | 61.39 | 61.39 | 61.39 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Papua New Guinea
- 100 Guyana 62.21 compare
- 101 Moldova 61.89 compare
- 102 Dominican Republic 61.48 compare
- 103 Bolivia 61.39 compare
- 105 Benin 61.07 compare
- 105 Bosnia and Herzegovina 61.07 compare
- 105 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 61.07 compare
More reference data data for Papua New Guinea
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2042 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0498 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0007 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3515 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6846 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5295 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.2811 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0038 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Papua New Guinea?
- Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in Papua New Guinea was 61.39 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 61.39 in 2003.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in Papua New Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was 61.39 in 2003.
- How does Papua New Guinea rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in Papua New Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Papua New Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.