Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
61.07
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
61.39
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
105th
Papua New Guinea rank
103rd
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 61.39 against 61.07 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.32.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th and Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.55 | 61.39 | 3.84 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 61.07 | 61.39 | 0.3278 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 61.39 against 61.07 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.32, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th and Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.