Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in China

China: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score was 69.16 in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
69.16
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
63rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
75.33
in 2003
All-time low
69.16
in 2013
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in China, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 75.32004: 75.32005: 75.32006: 75.32007: 75.32008: 75.32009: 75.32010: 75.32011: 75.32012: 75.32013: 69.22014: 69.22015: 69.22016: 69.22017: 69.22018: 69.22019: 69.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

China recorded 69.16 for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of down 8.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in China peaked at 75.33 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 69.16, in 2013.

That places China 63rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 17 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in China, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in China, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 75.33 —
2004 75.33 +0.0%
2005 75.33 +0.0%
2006 75.33 +0.0%
2007 75.33 +0.0%
2008 75.33 +0.0%
2009 75.33 +0.0%
2010 75.33 +0.0%
2011 75.33 +0.0%
2012 75.33 +0.0%
2013 69.16 -8.2%
2014 69.16 +0.0%
2015 69.16 +0.0%
2016 69.16 +0.0%
2017 69.16 +0.0%
2018 69.16 +0.0%
2019 69.16 +0.0%

China compared with similar countries

  • China's 69.16 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 61.68, 1.1× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • China's 69.16 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 73.57, 94% of the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 75.33 75.33 75.33 7
2010s 71.01 69.16 75.33 10

Countries ranked near China

  1. 64 Solomon Islands 69.1 compare
  2. 65 Germany 68.93 compare
  3. 66 Belgium 68.44 compare
  4. 66 Iran 68.44 compare
  5. 66 Malta 68.44 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in China?
Enforcing contracts: time (days) - score in China was 69.16 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 75.33 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: time (days) - score recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 69.16 in 2013.
How does China rank for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
China ranks 63rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: time (days) - score rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is down 8.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in China. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-time-days-score/china/">Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.