China vs Solomon Islands: Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score

China
69.16
in 2019
Solomon Islands
69.1
in 2019
China rank
61st
Solomon Islands rank
62nd

Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score over time

  • China
  • Solomon Islands
020406080200320112019

How they compare

China currently reports 69.16 against 69.1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.06.

Across all 17 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

China ranks 61st and Solomon Islands ranks 62nd of 188 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 75.33 69.1 6.23 China
2010s 71.01 69.1 1.91 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: time (days) - score, China or Solomon Islands?
China, at 69.16 against 69.1 in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: time (days) - score between China and Solomon Islands?
0.06, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Solomon Islands?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do China and Solomon Islands rank globally for enforcing contracts: time (days) - score?
China ranks 61st and Solomon Islands ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.