Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Uruguay

Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 8 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
8 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
93rd
of 190 countries
All-time high
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Uruguay, 2015–2019

024682015201720192015: 8 DB17-20 methodology2016: 8 DB17-20 methodology2017: 8 DB17-20 methodology2018: 8 DB17-20 methodology2019: 8 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

Uruguay recorded 8 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

Uruguay ranks 93rd of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Uruguay

  1. 93 Bahamas 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 93 Belgium 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 93 Belize 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 93 Bhutan 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 93 Cyprus 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 93 El Salvador 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 93 Jordan 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 93 Madagascar 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 93 Marshall Islands 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  10. 93 Mauritania 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  11. 93 Niger 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  12. 93 Panama 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  13. 93 Sierra Leone 8 DB17-20 methodology compare
  14. 93 Trinidad and Tobago 8 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Uruguay

All data for Uruguay β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Uruguay?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Uruguay was 8 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Uruguay?
The highest recorded value was 8 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Uruguay?
The lowest recorded value was 8 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Uruguay rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Uruguay ranks 93rd out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Uruguay data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Uruguay. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/uruguay/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Uruguay</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.