Madagascar vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Madagascar
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Uruguay
8 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Madagascar rank
93rd
Uruguay rank
93rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Madagascar
- Uruguay
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 8 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in Uruguay, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 93rd and Uruguay ranks 93rd of 190 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Madagascar or Uruguay?
- Madagascar, at 8 DB17-20 methodology against 8 DB17-20 methodology in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Madagascar and Uruguay?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Uruguay?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Madagascar ranks 93rd and Uruguay ranks 93rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.