Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Chinese Taipei

Chinese Taipei: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 14 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. β–² Rising

Latest (2019)
14 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
11th
of 190 countries
All-time high
14 DB17-20 methodology
in 2017
All-time low
13 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Chinese Taipei, 2015–2019

0510152015201720192015: 13 DB17-20 methodology2016: 13 DB17-20 methodology2017: 14 DB17-20 methodology2018: 14 DB17-20 methodology2019: 14 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Chinese Taipei is 14 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 7.7% over five years.

Chinese Taipei ranks 11th of 190 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Countries ranked near Chinese Taipei

  1. 9 United States 14.6 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 10 Korea 14.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 11 Denmark 14 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 11 Norway 14 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 11 Romania 14 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 11 United Arab Emirates 14 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Chinese Taipei

All data for Chinese Taipei β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Chinese Taipei?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Chinese Taipei was 14 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Chinese Taipei?
The highest recorded value was 14 DB17-20 methodology in 2017.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Chinese Taipei?
The lowest recorded value was 13 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Chinese Taipei rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Chinese Taipei ranks 11th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Chinese Taipei data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Chinese Taipei. Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/taiwan/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Chinese Taipei</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.