Taiwan vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Taiwan
14 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
United States
14.6 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Taiwan rank
11th
United States rank
9th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Taiwan
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 14.6 DB17-20 methodology against 14 DB17-20 methodology in Taiwan, a difference of 0.6 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was United States ahead.
Taiwan ranks 11th and United States ranks 9th of 191 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Taiwan or United States?
- United States, at 14.6 DB17-20 methodology against 14 DB17-20 methodology in Taiwan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Taiwan and United States?
- 0.6 DB17-20 methodology, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Taiwan and United States?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Taiwan and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Taiwan ranks 11th and United States ranks 9th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.