Statizoid

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Micronesia (Federated States of)

Micronesia (Federated States of): Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
170th
of 190 countries
All-time high
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Micronesia (Federated States of), 2015–2019

0123452015201720192015: 4.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 4.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 4.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 4.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 4.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Micronesia (Federated States of) is 4.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over five years.

Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 170th of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Micronesia (Federated States of)

  1. 170 Cambodia 4.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 170 Qatar 4.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 170 Sao Tome and Principe 4.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 170 Somalia 4.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 170 Tonga 4.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Micronesia (Federated States of)

All data for Micronesia (Federated States of) →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Micronesia (Federated States of)?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Micronesia (Federated States of) was 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Micronesia (Federated States of)?
The highest recorded value was 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Micronesia (Federated States of)?
The lowest recorded value was 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Micronesia (Federated States of) rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 170th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Micronesia (Federated States of) data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Micronesia (Federated States of). Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/micronesia-fed-sts/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/micronesia-fed-sts/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Micronesia (Federated States of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.