Micronesia, Federated States of vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)

Micronesia, Federated States of
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
171st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
171st

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time

  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • Sao Tome and Principe
012345201520172019

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Micronesia, Federated States of or Sao Tome and Principe?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Micronesia, Federated States of and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Sao Tome and Principe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia, Federated States of vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18). Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/micronesia-fed-sts/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/micronesia-fed-sts/sao-tome-and-principe/">Micronesia, Federated States of vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.