Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Kyrgyzstan

Kyrgyzstan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
162nd
of 191 countries
All-time high
5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2018
All-time low
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Kyrgyzstan, 2015–2019

0123452015201720192015: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 3.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Kyrgyzstan stood at 5 DB17-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

The figure is up 42.9% over five years.

That places Kyrgyzstan 162nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Kyrgyzstan, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology) in Kyrgyzstan, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 3.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 3.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 5 DB17-20 methodology +42.9%
2019 5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan

  1. 162 Afghanistan 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 162 Burundi 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 162 Cameroon 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 162 Congo 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 162 Gambia 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 162 Guinea 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 162 Iran 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 162 Mali 5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Kyrgyzstan

All data for Kyrgyzstan →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Kyrgyzstan?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Kyrgyzstan was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The highest recorded value was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2018.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
The lowest recorded value was 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Kyrgyzstan rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 162nd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Kyrgyzstan. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/kyrgyz-republic/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Kyrgyzstan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.