Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Iran (Islamic Republic of)

Iran (Islamic Republic of): Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
161st
of 190 countries
All-time high
5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2016
All-time low
4 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Iran (Islamic Republic of), 2015–2019

0123452015201720192015: 4 DB17-20 methodology2016: 5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Iran (Islamic Republic of) is 5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of up 25.0% over five years.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 161st of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Iran (Islamic Republic of)

  1. 161 Afghanistan 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 161 Burundi 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 161 Cameroon 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 161 Congo 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 161 Gambia 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 161 Guinea 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 161 Kyrgyzstan 5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 161 Mali 5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Iran (Islamic Republic of)

All data for Iran (Islamic Republic of) →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Iran (Islamic Republic of) was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
The highest recorded value was 5 DB17-20 methodology in 2016.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Iran (Islamic Republic of)?
The lowest recorded value was 4 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 161st out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Iran (Islamic Republic of) data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Iran (Islamic Republic of). Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/iran-islamic-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/iran-islamic-rep/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Iran (Islamic Republic of)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.