Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Israel

Israel: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) was 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
16th
of 190 countries
All-time high
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
All-time low
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Israel, 2015–2019

0510152015201720192015: 13.5 DB17-20 methodology2016: 13.5 DB17-20 methodology2017: 13.5 DB17-20 methodology2018: 13.5 DB17-20 methodology2019: 13.5 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Israel is 13.5 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

That places Israel 16th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Israel, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology) in Israel, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 13.5 DB17-20 methodology
2016 13.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 13.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 13.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 13.5 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Israel

  1. 16 Estonia 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 16 Latvia 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 16 Mauritius 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 16 Portugal 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 16 Serbia 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 16 Slovakia 13.5 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Israel

All data for Israel →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Israel?
Enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Israel was 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Israel?
The highest recorded value was 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) recorded in Israel?
The lowest recorded value was 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Israel rank for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
Israel ranks 16th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Israel data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Israel. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-18-db17-20-methodology/israel/">Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) in Israel</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.