Israel vs Portugal: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)
Israel
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Portugal
13.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Israel rank
16th
Portugal rank
16th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) over time
- Israel
- Portugal
How they compare
Israel currently reports 13.5 DB17-20 methodology against 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in Portugal, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 16th and Portugal ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18), Israel or Portugal?
- Israel, at 13.5 DB17-20 methodology against 13.5 DB17-20 methodology in Portugal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) between Israel and Portugal?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Portugal?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Portugal rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-18)?
- Israel ranks 16th and Portugal ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-18) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality of judicial processes index is the sum of the court structure and proceedings, case management, court automation and alternative dispute resolution. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.