Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Procedures was 38 number in 2014. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Zimbabwe, 2003–2014
Source: World Bank. Measured in number.
Analysis
In 2014, enforcing contracts: procedures in Zimbabwe stood at 38 number. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures in Zimbabwe peaked at 38 number in 2003 and was at its lowest, 38 number, in 2003.
That places Zimbabwe 86th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Procedures in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | number | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 38 number | — |
| 2004 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 38 number | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 38 number | +0.0% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 38 number is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 40.61 number, 94% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 38 number is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 39.5 number, 96% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38 number | 38 number | 38 number | 7 |
| 2010s | 38 number | 38 number | 38 number | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
- 86 Croatia 38 number compare
- 86 Ethiopia 38 number compare
- 86 Gabon 38 number compare
- 86 Ghana 38 number compare
- 86 Greece 38 number compare
- 86 Kyrgyzstan 38 number compare
- 86 Madagascar 38 number compare
- 86 North Macedonia 38 number compare
- 86 Paraguay 38 number compare
- 86 Tanzania 38 number compare
- 86 Uganda 38 number compare
More reference data data for Zimbabwe
- Exchange rate, new LCU per USD extended backward, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Exchange rate, old LCU per USD extended forward, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Official exchange rate, LCU per USD, period average 58,959 (2026)
- Political opposition, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Elected parliament and government, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
- Global number of reported disasters by size, gaps filled 0 events (2024)
- Annual precipitation, annual growth rate 122.78 % change on previous year (2025)
- Free country, gaps filled 0 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, gaps filled 5 (2025)
- Civil liberties rating, annual growth rate 0 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: procedures in Zimbabwe?
- Enforcing contracts: procedures in Zimbabwe was 38 number in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 38 number in 2003.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 38 number in 2003.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for enforcing contracts: procedures?
- Zimbabwe ranks 86th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is enforcing contracts: procedures rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.