North Macedonia vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Procedures

North Macedonia
38 number
in 2014
Zimbabwe
38 number
in 2014
North Macedonia rank
83rd
Zimbabwe rank
83rd

Enforcing contracts: Procedures over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Zimbabwe
010203040200320082014

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 38 number against 38 number in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 181 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 38.71 number 38 number 0.7143 number North Macedonia
2010s 38 number 38 number 0 number

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: procedures, North Macedonia or Zimbabwe?
North Macedonia, at 38 number against 38 number in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: procedures between North Macedonia and Zimbabwe?
0 number, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do North Macedonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: procedures?
North Macedonia ranks 83rd and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number)
Unit
number
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The procedures to enforce contracts records the list of procedural steps compiled for each economy that traces the chronology of a commercial dispute before the relevant court. A procedure is defined as any interaction, required by law or commonly carried out in practice, between the parties or between them and the judge or court officer. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.