Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Peru

Peru: Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score was 37.5 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
37.5
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
125th
of 184 countries
All-time high
37.5
in 2006
All-time low
34.38
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Peru, 2003–2014

0102030402003200820142003: 34.42004: 34.42005: 34.42006: 37.52007: 37.52008: 37.52009: 37.52010: 37.52011: 37.52012: 37.52013: 37.52014: 37.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Peru is 37.5, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is up 9.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Peru peaked at 37.5 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 34.38, in 2003.

Peru ranks 125th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Peru, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Peru, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 34.38
2004 34.38 +0.0%
2005 34.38 +0.0%
2006 37.5 +9.1%
2007 37.5 +0.0%
2008 37.5 +0.0%
2009 37.5 +0.0%
2010 37.5 +0.0%
2011 37.5 +0.0%
2012 37.5 +0.0%
2013 37.5 +0.0%
2014 37.5 +0.0%

Peru compared with similar countries

  • Peru's 37.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 50, 75% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Peru's 37.5 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 42.19, 89% of the median. (32 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 36.16 34.38 37.5 7
2010s 37.5 37.5 37.5 5

Countries ranked near Peru

  1. 124 Nigeria 39.91 compare
  2. 125 Bangladesh 37.5 compare
  3. 125 Benin 37.5 compare
  4. 125 Chad 37.5 compare
  5. 125 Lesotho 37.5 compare
  6. 125 Maldives 37.5 compare
  7. 125 Saudi Arabia 37.5 compare
  8. 125 Uzbekistan 37.5 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Peru

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Peru?
Enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score in Peru was 37.5 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Peru?
The highest recorded value was 37.5 in 2006.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score recorded in Peru?
The lowest recorded value was 34.38 in 2003.
How does Peru rank for enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score?
Peru ranks 125th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Peru?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Peru data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Peru. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-procedures-number-score/peru/">Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score in Peru</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for procedures to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.