What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Saudi Arabia?

The highest recorded value was 65.26 in 2019.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Saudi Arabia?

The lowest recorded value was 56.92 in 2015.

How does Saudi Arabia rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?

Saudi Arabia ranks 51st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Where does this Saudi Arabia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Saudi Arabia

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Saudi Arabia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 65.26 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

65.26

Change on year

up 2.9%

World rank

51st

of 188 countries

All-time high

65.26

in 2019

All-time low

56.92

in 2015

Years of data

2015–2019

Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Saudi Arabia, 2015–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Saudi Arabia stood at 65.26. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of up 2.9% on the previous year and up 14.6% over five years.

That places Saudi Arabia 51st out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Saudi Arabia

48 Mauritania 65.99 compare
49 Saint Kitts and Nevis 65.51 compare
50 Japan 65.26 compare
52 Cape Verde 64.84 compare
53 Chile 64.72 compare
54 Poland 64.36 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Saudi Arabia

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 10.41 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9641 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2207 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1847 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0139 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.07 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.64 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.44 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.4 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.44 (2050)

All data for Saudi Arabia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Saudi Arabia?: Enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Saudi Arabia was 65.26 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Saudi Arabia?: The highest recorded value was 65.26 in 2019.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Saudi Arabia?: The lowest recorded value was 56.92 in 2015.
How does Saudi Arabia rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?: Saudi Arabia ranks 51st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Saudi Arabia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.