Japan vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Japan
65.26
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
65.26
in 2019
Japan rank
50th
Saudi Arabia rank
51st
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 65.26 against 65.26 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 50th and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 188 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Japan or Saudi Arabia?
- Japan, at 65.26 against 65.26 in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Japan and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Saudi Arabia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 50th and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.