Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Australia
Australia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score was 79 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Australia, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Australia recorded 79 for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
Australia ranks 6th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score in Australia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 79 | — |
| 2016 | 79 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 79 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 79 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 79 | +0.0% |
Australia compared with similar countries
- Australia's 79 is above the median for high income countries, which is 65.39, 1.2× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Australia's 79 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 57.18, 1.4× the median. (28 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Australia
More reference data data for Australia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.21 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 28.02 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 38.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 6.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 118.71 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 170.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 13.9 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Australia?
- Enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score in Australia was 79 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Australia?
- The highest recorded value was 79 in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score recorded in Australia?
- The lowest recorded value was 79 in 2015.
- How does Australia rank for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 6th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Australia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.