Australia vs Estonia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Australia
79
in 2019
Estonia
76.06
in 2019
Australia rank
6th
Estonia rank
8th
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Estonia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 79 against 76.06 in Estonia, a difference of 2.94.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 6th and Estonia ranks 8th of 188 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Australia or Estonia?
- Australia, at 79 against 76.06 in Estonia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Australia and Estonia?
- 2.94, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Estonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Estonia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 6th and Estonia ranks 8th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.