Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Vietnam

Vietnam: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 65.89 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
65.89
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
46th
of 184 countries
All-time high
66.08
in 2009
All-time low
63.47
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Vietnam, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 63.52004: 63.52005: 65.12006: 65.12007: 65.12008: 65.12009: 66.12010: 66.12011: 66.12012: 65.92013: 65.92014: 65.9

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Vietnam stood at 65.89.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Vietnam peaked at 66.08 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 63.47, in 2003.

That places Vietnam 46th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the top quarter.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Vietnam, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Vietnam, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 63.47 —
2004 63.47 +0.0%
2005 65.14 +2.6%
2006 65.14 +0.0%
2007 65.14 +0.0%
2008 65.14 +0.0%
2009 66.08 +1.4%
2010 66.08 +0.0%
2011 66.08 +0.0%
2012 65.89 -0.3%
2013 65.89 +0.0%
2014 65.89 +0.0%

Vietnam compared with similar countries

  • Vietnam's 65.89 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57.62, 1.1× the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Vietnam's 65.89 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62.95, 1.0× the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 64.8 63.47 66.08 7
2010s 65.96 65.89 66.08 5

Countries ranked near Vietnam

  1. 43 Tanzania 66.17 compare
  2. 44 South Africa 66.14 compare
  3. 45 Romania 66.11 compare
  4. 47 Czechia 65.87 compare
  5. 48 Tonga 65.65 compare
  6. 49 Ethiopia 65.43 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Vietnam

All data for Vietnam →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Vietnam?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Vietnam was 65.89 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Vietnam?
The highest recorded value was 66.08 in 2009.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Vietnam?
The lowest recorded value was 63.47 in 2003.
How does Vietnam rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Vietnam ranks 46th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Vietnam?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Vietnam data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Vietnam. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/viet-nam/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Vietnam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.