South Africa vs Vietnam: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

South Africa
66.14
in 2014
Vietnam
65.89
in 2014
South Africa rank
44th
Vietnam rank
46th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • South Africa
  • Vietnam
0204060200320082014

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 66.14 against 65.89 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.25.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 44th and Vietnam ranks 46th of 181 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Vietnam Difference Ahead
2000s 65.1 64.8 0.3029 South Africa
2010s 66.14 65.96 0.1774 South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, South Africa or Vietnam?
South Africa, at 66.14 against 65.89 in Vietnam as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between South Africa and Vietnam?
0.25, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Vietnam?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do South Africa and Vietnam rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
South Africa ranks 44th and Vietnam ranks 46th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.