How does Serbia rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?

Serbia ranks 87th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.

Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Serbia?

Over the last ten years it is up 31.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Serbia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Serbia

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Serbia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Serbia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 57.59 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)

57.59

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

87th

of 181 countries

All-time high

59.69

in 2005

All-time low

43.96

in 2003

Years of data

2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Serbia, 2003–2014

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Serbia stood at 57.59.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 31.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Serbia peaked at 59.69 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 43.96, in 2003.

Serbia ranks 87th of 181 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	55.14	43.96	59.69	7
2010s	58.38	57.59	59.51	5

Countries ranked near Serbia

84 North Macedonia 57.71 compare
85 Albania 57.66 compare
86 Ecuador 57.62 compare
88 Ghana 57.59 compare
89 Zambia 57.53 compare
90 Taiwan 57.52 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Serbia

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6055 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3321 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3467 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.36 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.29 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.44 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 15.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.89 (2050)

All data for Serbia →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Serbia?: Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Serbia was 57.59 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Serbia?: The highest recorded value was 59.69 in 2005.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Serbia?: The lowest recorded value was 43.96 in 2003.
How does Serbia rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?: Serbia ranks 87th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Serbia?: Over the last ten years it is up 31.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Serbia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.