North Macedonia vs Serbia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

North Macedonia
57.71
in 2014
Serbia
57.59
in 2014
North Macedonia rank
84th
Serbia rank
87th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Serbia
0204060200320082014

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 57.71 against 57.59 in Serbia, a difference of 0.12.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 84th and Serbia ranks 87th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 57.32 55.14 2.18 North Macedonia
2010s 56.91 58.38 1.47 Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, North Macedonia or Serbia?
North Macedonia, at 57.71 against 57.59 in Serbia as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between North Macedonia and Serbia?
0.12, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Serbia?
12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
How do North Macedonia and Serbia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
North Macedonia ranks 84th and Serbia ranks 87th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.