Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Samoa

Samoa: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 57.78 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)
57.78
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
83rd
of 184 countries
All-time high
57.78
in 2003
All-time low
57.78
in 2003
Years of data
12
2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Samoa, 2003–2014

02040602003200820142003: 57.82004: 57.82005: 57.82006: 57.82007: 57.82008: 57.82009: 57.82010: 57.82011: 57.82012: 57.82013: 57.82014: 57.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Samoa is 57.78, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Samoa peaked at 57.78 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 57.78, in 2003.

Samoa ranks 83rd of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Samoa, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Samoa, 2003 to 2014.
Year Value Change
2003 57.78
2004 57.78 +0.0%
2005 57.78 +0.0%
2006 57.78 +0.0%
2007 57.78 +0.0%
2008 57.78 +0.0%
2009 57.78 +0.0%
2010 57.78 +0.0%
2011 57.78 +0.0%
2012 57.78 +0.0%
2013 57.78 +0.0%
2014 57.78 +0.0%

Samoa compared with similar countries

  • Samoa's 57.78 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 57.62, 1.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Samoa's 57.78 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62.95, 92% of the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 57.78 57.78 57.78 7
2010s 57.78 57.78 57.78 5

Countries ranked near Samoa

  1. 80 Bolivia 58 compare
  2. 81 Venezuela 57.88 compare
  3. 82 Paraguay 57.8 compare
  4. 84 North Macedonia 57.71 compare
  5. 85 Albania 57.66 compare
  6. 86 Ecuador 57.62 compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for Samoa

All data for Samoa →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Samoa?
Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Samoa was 57.78 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Samoa?
The highest recorded value was 57.78 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Samoa?
The lowest recorded value was 57.78 in 2003.
How does Samoa rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Samoa ranks 83rd out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Samoa?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Samoa data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Samoa. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-db04-15-methodology-score/samoa/">Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Samoa</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 2,119 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.