North Macedonia vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
North Macedonia
57.71
in 2014
Samoa
57.78
in 2014
North Macedonia rank
84th
Samoa rank
83rd
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- North Macedonia
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 57.78 against 57.71 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 84th and Samoa ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.32 | 57.78 | 0.4531 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 56.91 | 57.78 | 0.8636 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, North Macedonia or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 57.78 against 57.71 in North Macedonia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between North Macedonia and Samoa?
- 0.07, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Samoa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do North Macedonia and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- North Macedonia ranks 84th and Samoa ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.