How does Egypt rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?

Egypt ranks 147th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.

Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Egypt?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Egypt data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Egypt

Name: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Egypt
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Egypt: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score was 44.02 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)

44.02

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

147th

of 181 countries

All-time high

44.02

in 2003

All-time low

44.02

in 2003

Years of data

2003–2014

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score in Egypt, 2003–2014

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Egypt stood at 44.02. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Egypt peaked at 44.02 in 2003 and was at its lowest, 44.02, in 2003.

That places Egypt 147th out of 181 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	44.02	44.02	44.02	7
2010s	44.02	44.02	44.02	5

Countries ranked near Egypt

144 Indonesia 44.31 compare
145 Cyprus 44.2 compare
146 Congo 44.11 compare
148 Burkina Faso 43.83 compare
149 Malawi 43.73 compare
150 Gabon 43.51 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Egypt

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2851 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.956 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4622 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.55 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 71.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 6.55 (2050)

All data for Egypt →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Egypt?: Enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score in Egypt was 44.02 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Egypt?: The highest recorded value was 44.02 in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score recorded in Egypt?: The lowest recorded value was 44.02 in 2003.
How does Egypt rank for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?: Egypt ranks 147th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Egypt?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Egypt data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.