Egypt vs Indonesia: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Egypt
44.02
in 2014
Indonesia
44.31
in 2014
Egypt rank
147th
Indonesia rank
144th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Egypt
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 44.31 against 44.02 in Egypt, a difference of 0.29.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 147th and Indonesia ranks 144th of 181 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.02 | 37.29 | 6.73 | Egypt |
| 2010s | 44.02 | 39.65 | 4.37 | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Egypt or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 44.31 against 44.02 in Egypt as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Egypt and Indonesia?
- 0.29, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Indonesia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Egypt and Indonesia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Egypt ranks 147th and Indonesia ranks 144th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.