Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in New Zealand
New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▼ Falling
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) in New Zealand, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
New Zealand recorded 3 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 33.3% over five years.
That places New Zealand 95th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near New Zealand
- 95 Bangladesh 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Indonesia 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Russian Federation 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Japan 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Algeria 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Bahrain, Kingdom of 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Barbados 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Benin 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Brunei Darussalam 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Burundi 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Central African Republic 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Chile 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Comoros, Union of the 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Costa Rica 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Cyprus 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Djibouti 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 El Salvador 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Eswatini, Kingdom of 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Fiji, Republic of 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Ghana 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Greece 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Guatemala 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Honduras 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Hungary 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Israel 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Italy 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Kiribati 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Latvia 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Malta 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Marshall Islands, Republic of the 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Nepal 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Netherlands 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Paraguay 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Puerto Rico 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Senegal 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Seychelles 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Solomon Islands 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Tanzania, United Republic of 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Thailand 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Togo 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Trinidad and Tobago 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Vanuatu 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Vietnam 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 95 Zimbabwe 3 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for New Zealand
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4532 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0459 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 10.93 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.52 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 42.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 47.53 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.2499 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in New Zealand?
- Enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) in New Zealand was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in New Zealand?
- The highest recorded value was 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) recorded in New Zealand?
- The lowest recorded value was 3 DB17-20 methodology in 2017.
- How does New Zealand rank for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- New Zealand ranks 95th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this New Zealand data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.