Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Uruguay
Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Uruguay, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Uruguay recorded 1 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over five years.
Uruguay ranks 71st of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 1 DB17-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 2 DB17-20 methodology, 50% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 1 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 71 Japan 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Albania 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Bahrain 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Cyprus 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Hong Kong 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Iran 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Jordan 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Maldives 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Malta 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Mauritania 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Mongolia 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Montenegro 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Panama 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Papua New Guinea 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Thailand 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Venezuela 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 71 Vietnam 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Uruguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2999 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.87 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3685 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2195 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 33.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.01 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Uruguay?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Uruguay was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Uruguay rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Uruguay ranks 71st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.