Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Mauritania

Mauritania: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
1 DB17-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
71st
of 191 countries
All-time high
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2017
All-time low
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2015
Years of data
5
2015–2019

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Mauritania, 2015–2019

00.20.40.60.812015201720192015: 0 DB17-20 methodology2016: 0 DB17-20 methodology2017: 1 DB17-20 methodology2018: 1 DB17-20 methodology2019: 1 DB17-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Mauritania is 1 DB17-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.

Mauritania ranks 71st of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Mauritania, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology) in Mauritania, 2015 to 2019.
Year DB17-20 methodology Change
2015 0 DB17-20 methodology —
2016 0 DB17-20 methodology —
2017 1 DB17-20 methodology —
2018 1 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 1 DB17-20 methodology +0.0%

Countries ranked near Mauritania

  1. 71 Japan 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  2. 71 Albania 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  3. 71 Bahrain 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  4. 71 Cyprus 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  5. 71 Hong Kong 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  6. 71 Iran 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  7. 71 Jordan 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  8. 71 Maldives 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  9. 71 Malta 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  10. 71 Mongolia 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  11. 71 Montenegro 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  12. 71 Panama 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  13. 71 Papua New Guinea 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  14. 71 Thailand 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  15. 71 Uruguay 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  16. 71 Venezuela 1 DB17-20 methodology compare
  17. 71 Vietnam 1 DB17-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Mauritania

All data for Mauritania →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Mauritania?
Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Mauritania was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Mauritania?
The highest recorded value was 1 DB17-20 methodology in 2017.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Mauritania?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
How does Mauritania rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Mauritania ranks 71st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Mauritania data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Mauritania. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/mauritania/">Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Mauritania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.