Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Paraguay
Paraguay: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Paraguay, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB17-20 methodology.
Analysis
Paraguay recorded 1.5 DB17-20 methodology for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
That places Paraguay 56th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) in Paraguay, year by year
| Year | DB17-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.5 DB17-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Paraguay compared with similar countries
- Paraguay's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1 DB17-20 methodology, 1.5× the median. (56 countries reporting)
- Paraguay's 1.5 DB17-20 methodology is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, 3.0× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Paraguay
- 56 Antigua and Barbuda 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Belize 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Colombia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Dominica 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Grenada 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Malawi 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 New Zealand 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Poland 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 San Marino 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Serbia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Slovenia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Saint Kitts and Nevis 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Saint Lucia 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
- 56 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1.5 DB17-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Paraguay
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3166 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6344 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.06 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5539 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 29.48 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 38.68 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 3.45 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Paraguay?
- Enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) in Paraguay was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Paraguay?
- The highest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) recorded in Paraguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Paraguay rank for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Paraguay ranks 56th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Paraguay data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.