Paraguay vs Poland: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Paraguay
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Poland
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Paraguay rank
56th
Poland rank
56th
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Paraguay
- Poland
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Poland, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 56th and Poland ranks 56th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Paraguay or Poland?
- Paraguay, at 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Poland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Paraguay and Poland?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Paraguay and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Paraguay ranks 56th and Poland ranks 56th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.