What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Sierra Leone?

The highest recorded value was 55.7% in 2013.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Sierra Leone?

The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2003.

How does Sierra Leone rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?

Sierra Leone ranks 145th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Sierra Leone

Name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Sierra Leone
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Sierra Leone: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 55.7% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)

55.7%

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

145th

of 188 countries

All-time high

55.7%

in 2013

All-time low

0.0%

in 2003

Years of data

2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Sierra Leone, 2003–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Sierra Leone stood at 55.7%. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Sierra Leone peaked at 55.7% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2003.

That places Sierra Leone 145th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	7
2010s	39.0%	0.0%	55.7%	10

Countries ranked near Sierra Leone

142 Zambia 56.6% compare
143 Honduras 56.5% compare
144 Nigeria 56.4% compare
146 Serbia 55.6% compare
147 Botswana 55.3% compare
148 Dominican Republic 54.1% compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Sierra Leone

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0238 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4498 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5935 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.12 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.5935 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0797 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.044 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.91 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.72 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6534 (2050)

All data for Sierra Leone →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Sierra Leone?: Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Sierra Leone was 55.7% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Sierra Leone?: The highest recorded value was 55.7% in 2013.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Sierra Leone?: The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2003.
How does Sierra Leone rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?: Sierra Leone ranks 145th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Sierra Leone data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.