What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Nigeria?

Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Nigeria was 56.4% in 2019, according to the World Bank.

What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Nigeria?

The highest recorded value was 56.4% in 2013.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Nigeria?

The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2003.

How does Nigeria rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?

Nigeria ranks 144th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Where does this Nigeria data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Nigeria

Name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Nigeria
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Nigeria: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 56.4% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)

56.4%

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

144th

of 188 countries

All-time high

56.4%

in 2013

All-time low

0.0%

in 2003

Years of data

2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Nigeria, 2003–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Nigeria stood at 56.4%. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over five years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Nigeria peaked at 56.4% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2003.

Nigeria ranks 144th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	7
2010s	39.5%	0.0%	56.4%	10

Countries ranked near Nigeria

141 Panama 57.4% compare
142 Zambia 56.6% compare
143 Honduras 56.5% compare
145 Sierra Leone 55.7% compare
146 Serbia 55.6% compare
147 Botswana 55.3% compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Nigeria

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.77 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 19.51 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.62 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 27 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 5.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.8 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 81.9 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 121.16 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 14.27 (2050)

All data for Nigeria →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Nigeria?: Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Nigeria was 56.4% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Nigeria?: The highest recorded value was 56.4% in 2013.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Nigeria?: The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2003.
How does Nigeria rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?: Nigeria ranks 144th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Nigeria data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.