Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Oman

Oman: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 83.1% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
83.1%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
11th
of 191 countries
All-time high
83.1%
in 2003
All-time low
83.1%
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Oman, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 83.12004: 83.12005: 83.12006: 83.12007: 83.12008: 83.12009: 83.12010: 83.12011: 83.12012: 83.12013: 83.12014: 83.12015: 83.12016: 83.12017: 83.12018: 83.12019: 83.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Oman is 83.1%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Oman peaked at 83.1% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 83.1%, in 2003.

Oman ranks 11th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Oman, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Oman, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 83.1% —
2004 83.1% +0.0%
2005 83.1% +0.0%
2006 83.1% +0.0%
2007 83.1% +0.0%
2008 83.1% +0.0%
2009 83.1% +0.0%
2010 83.1% +0.0%
2011 83.1% +0.0%
2012 83.1% +0.0%
2013 83.1% +0.0%
2014 83.1% +0.0%
2015 83.1% +0.0%
2016 83.1% +0.0%
2017 83.1% +0.0%
2018 83.1% +0.0%
2019 83.1% +0.0%

Oman compared with similar countries

  • Oman's 83.1% is above the median for high income countries, which is 74.5%, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Oman's 83.1% is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 70.6%, 1.2× the median. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 83.1% 83.1% 83.1% 7
2010s 83.1% 83.1% 83.1% 10

Countries ranked near Oman

  1. 8 Germany 83.9% compare
  2. 9 Bahrain 83.6% compare
  3. 10 Hungary 83.2% compare
  4. 12 Croatia 83.0% compare
  5. 12 Ethiopia 83.0% compare
  6. 14 Seychelles 82.8% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Oman

All data for Oman →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Oman?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Oman was 83.1% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Oman?
The highest recorded value was 83.1% in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Oman?
The lowest recorded value was 83.1% in 2003.
How does Oman rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Oman ranks 11th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Oman?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Oman data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Oman. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/oman/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Oman</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.