Croatia vs Oman: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Croatia
83.0%
in 2019
Oman
83.1%
in 2019
Croatia rank
12th
Oman rank
11th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Croatia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 83.1% against 83.0% in Croatia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 12th and Oman ranks 11th of 190 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3% | 83.1% | 3.1% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 83.7% | 83.1% | 0.5% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Croatia or Oman?
- Oman, at 83.1% against 83.0% in Croatia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Croatia and Oman?
- 0.1%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Oman?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Croatia and Oman rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Croatia ranks 12th and Oman ranks 11th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.