Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Norway

Norway: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 89.0% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
89.0%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
3rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
89.0%
in 2003
All-time low
89.0%
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Norway, 2003–2019

0204060802003201120192003: 892004: 892005: 892006: 892007: 892008: 892009: 892010: 892011: 892012: 892013: 892014: 892015: 892016: 892017: 892018: 892019: 89

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Norway is 89.0%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Norway peaked at 89.0% in 2003 and was at its lowest, 89.0%, in 2003.

Norway ranks 3rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Norway, year by year

Annual values for Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Norway, 2003 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2003 89.0% —
2004 89.0% +0.0%
2005 89.0% +0.0%
2006 89.0% +0.0%
2007 89.0% +0.0%
2008 89.0% +0.0%
2009 89.0% +0.0%
2010 89.0% +0.0%
2011 89.0% +0.0%
2012 89.0% +0.0%
2013 89.0% +0.0%
2014 89.0% +0.0%
2015 89.0% +0.0%
2016 89.0% +0.0%
2017 89.0% +0.0%
2018 89.0% +0.0%
2019 89.0% +0.0%

Norway compared with similar countries

  • Norway's 89.0% is above the median for high income countries, which is 74.5%, 1.2× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Norway's 89.0% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 74.9%, 1.2× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 89.0% 89.0% 89.0% 7
2010s 89.0% 89.0% 89.0% 10

Countries ranked near Norway

  1. 1 Iceland 90.0% compare
  2. 2 Luxembourg 89.2% compare
  3. 4 South Korea 85.8% compare
  4. 4 Slovenia 85.8% compare
  5. 6 San Marino 84.5% compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Norway

All data for Norway →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Norway?
Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Norway was 89.0% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Norway?
The highest recorded value was 89.0% in 2003.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Norway?
The lowest recorded value was 89.0% in 2003.
How does Norway rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Norway ranks 3rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score rising or falling in Norway?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Norway data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Norway. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-score/norway/">Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Norway</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,094 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.