Iceland vs Norway: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Iceland
90.0%
in 2019
Norway
89.0%
in 2019
Iceland rank
1st
Norway rank
3rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Iceland
- Norway
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 90.0% against 89.0% in Norway, a difference of 1.0%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 1st and Norway ranks 3rd of 190 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.4% | 89.0% | 2.4% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 90.0% | 89.0% | 1.0% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Iceland or Norway?
- Iceland, at 90.0% against 89.0% in Norway as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Iceland and Norway?
- 1.0%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Norway?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Norway rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Iceland ranks 1st and Norway ranks 3rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.