What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Comoros?

Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Comoros was 0.0% in 2019, according to the World Bank.

What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Comoros?

The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 2005.

What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Comoros?

The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2005.

How does Comoros rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?

Comoros ranks 185th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Where does this Comoros data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Comoros

Name: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Comoros
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Comoros: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score was 0.0% in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

0.0%

World rank

185th

of 188 countries

All-time high

0.0%

in 2005

All-time low

0.0%

in 2005

Years of data

2005–2019

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score in Comoros, 2005–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Comoros is 0.0%, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.

Over the whole period, enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Comoros peaked at 0.0% in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0.0%, in 2005.

Comoros ranks 185th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	5
2010s	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%	10

Countries ranked near Comoros

182 Burkina Faso 8.2% compare
183 Central African Republic 7.9% compare
184 Zimbabwe 6.6% compare
185 Cambodia 0.0% compare
185 Papua New Guinea 0.0% compare
185 East Timor 0.0% compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Comoros

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 1.81 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 10.74 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0211 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0012 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0068 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2117 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 57.11 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.3222 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 56.09 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 5.6 (2050)

All data for Comoros →

Frequently asked questions

What is enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Comoros?: Enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score in Comoros was 0.0% in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Comoros?: The highest recorded value was 0.0% in 2005.
What is the lowest enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score recorded in Comoros?: The lowest recorded value was 0.0% in 2005.
How does Comoros rank for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?: Comoros ranks 185th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Where does this Comoros data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.