Comoros vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Comoros
0.0%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
6.6%
in 2019
Comoros rank
185th
Zimbabwe rank
184th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Comoros
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 6.6% against 0.0% in Comoros, a difference of 6.6%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 185th and Zimbabwe ranks 184th of 188 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 64.1% | 64.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 4.6% | 4.6% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Comoros or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 6.6% against 0.0% in Comoros as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 6.6%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Comoros and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Comoros ranks 185th and Zimbabwe ranks 184th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.